clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Question of the day: The midfield

New, 14 comments

Play Technical Director for Sporting KC. Which midfielders would you keep and why?

Thad Bell

Continuing the Play the Sporting KC Technical Director question, today it is the midfielders.

With the way the season went in general for Sporting Kansas City and more specifically how they went down in flames at the hands of the LA Galaxy, there is need to vent for many. Some fans want to burn it all down, make a complete house cleaning of players and coaches, others just want one or two players to move on and exchanged for new blood.

In the interest of giving our community a chance to weigh in on the roster and perhaps vent some of their anger, frustration and grief, we are offering a place for the fans to be the Technical Director for Sporting Kansas City.

This is not reality. This is not taking contracts, CBA’s, option years, expansion drafts, DP tags, TAM, GAM, international status or anything else into account but our own opinions and emotions about each player.

The forwards were the starting spot and the defenders are up after this but today it is the midfield. There have been some bright spots, some injuries, some players that may have not performed up to expectations. A mixture of youth and veterans combine to make this and interesting debate.

If you were Sporting Kansas City’s Technical Director, what would you do?

Keep the player for next season? Banish them from Kansas City and never allow them to train at Pinnacle or have the world’s best BBQ again? Or, wait a couple more games and see how they respond to this adversity?

Vote and let us know in the comments why you voted the way you did. Some may approach it logically, some from their heart and yet others from that dark space that just wants change at all cost. There are no wrong answers.

In a couple days we will compile the results and see if that gives any clear direction.

Debate, keep it civil.